Editorial Principles

Seeking Alpha accepts submissions from credible analysts and reviews them for clarity, consistency and impact. Among other principles, our editors adhere to the following criteria in deciding whether or not to publish an article:

  1. Articles must interest our readership. For stock-oriented posts, we consider carefully: Does the article help an investor in their decision making process for the investment security in question? Does it provide meaningful analysis of the company's products, services, competitive environment, management, corporate strategy, earnings potential and balance sheet? For market outlook and economics posts, we consider whether the article is helpful for stock market investors and to what degree the viewpoint is actionable. The article should be written for investors, and not focused on politics, societal issues, or any sort of campaigning efforts?

  2. Articles must conform to Seeking Alpha's standards of rigor and clarity. In order to best use our editorial resources, we often reject articles that require extensive copy-editing, are poorly written, or are unusually long.

  3. Articles about stocks trading at less than $1 per share or with market caps below $100 million will receive extra editorial scrutiny but are still eligible for publication. Analysts should not be surprised by ‘Decline’ responses for articles that cover nanocap stocks trading below a $25 million market cap or 50c share price, although these are not by default ineligible.

  4. The analyst must agree to Seeking Alpha's disclosure standards.

The stocks covered on Seeking Alpha, and their Buy, Sell or Hold ratings, are decided by our contributing analysts of individual articles (having satisfied quality and integrity criteria), and not by our editors. Editorial feedback on articles is intended to support the analyst in clarifying the analyst’s viewpoint and not interfere with the substance of the analyst’s argument or viewpoint. Our strict adherence to these editorial guidelines means that Seeking Alpha’s contributing analysts are genuinely independent.

Analysts are required to disclose personal positions they hold in stocks they write about. Since Seeking Alpha's editors have no input into which stocks are covered or the nature of the commentary on them, they are not required to disclose positions in articles they edit.